I aint buyin' it!

I was in a programming class and the instructor started the lecture by telling us about the great architects around the world and their dedication to the profession. He also begins to talk about how your last year as a an architecture student will define your career and begin to define the rest of your profession. I think we all take him pretty serious (even though he loves to name drop and exaggerate). At the end of his little rant he throws out the; "Whatever you are doing two years after graduation, that is going to do for the rest of your professional career. If you're working for a home builder you're going to be stuck working within that section." I think it is safe to say that that shook the class. He then says; "OMA, Pelli, Foster (famous architects) -- They arent going to hire someone that has been designing Walmarts!" All of this made sense. I mean, why would any architectural firm that pushes the envelope of design give two seconds to an applicant that just places a big box of concrete on a site. Yeah, sure there is a decent level of design and research that goes into layout, lighting and other 'tabs' of design that go into how customers shop and what they are more willing to buy because of the design, but it is nothing that gives a soul to the architecture. It is just designed to persuade customers to stay in the building longer and purchase more items.

But, I have seen this before. I see it every semester with the number drop of students that work their way up at the job they've had to help pay for school. I see it within my circle of friends that have children and they have to drop out to help support their child. But I also see people finish and maintain their goal of graduating and getting a job at a place they enjoy working. It is so easy to take a job that you're just taking for the money. I get it, students are broke and need a job to help pay for tuition and supplies. I just don't buy that how society works is the way we have to go about our lives. It is too easy to get sucked into these 'traps' because time flies by. It starts off getting a job you don't like for quick money. Get in, get the money, get out. But, getting out was five years ago and now you've worked your way through a position that you don't like and can't go back to where you really wanted to go because you never developed experience. Now, you're just part of a machine. You're just playing your part and it is no longer about developing your individuality and expressing yourself. You got sidetracked into working in a container for corporations instead of investing your time bettering yourself and doing something you have a passion and something you give a damn about. Now, you've given away your life for what? A new car you couldn't afford or some outfit that probably looks stupid on you. It no longer becomes doing something that makes you happy and giving your soul a purpose, but about filling that void in your life with objects that make you feel better after you come home from work. Does any of that make sense? Shouldn't the work be just as fulfilling. You work the from eight-plus hours a day PLUS commuting only to come home to a box with filled objects to keep your mind off of a sh*t job.

The sad part is that most people don't understand they're in that 'trap'. I think most people think that it is a good job and they should be happy and appreciative for the opportunity. They bring home a decent pay, are able to support themselves, got dental... I think most people in the American society are afraid of failing at something. We all went through this education system that teaches us how to pass tests instead of learning the actual material. I think its fuc*king bonkers that there are classes in high school specially for passing the high school exit exams.

I digress. There is nothing wrong doing something short term that gets you to where you want to get. But you have to push yourself to get-in and get-out to do what you really want to do. Something that you genuinely enjoy doing and pushes you to improve yourself. There's nothing keeping anyone from bettering themselves. We all have twenty-four hours in a day and yeah some people have more resources than others, but you just have to work that much harder. It is all about discipline, being able to take a step back, assess the information and work ethic.

Studio Process: Future City_03_Interpreting the data

Houston

Over the past week we have been reading articles, collecting information and looking for interesting points we can base a project around. For myself, I started thinking about how we move, communicate, how technology will evolve and how all of these topics will come together. On the first day, I made about four different topics of interests. The topics included: how we build, how we move, how we interact and how we work.

How do we build?
The first topic dealt with Houston's history with flooding and a part of global warming. I think many of my peers remember how badly Houston kept flooding in the 90's. Or maybe it just seemed like a huge deal because I was so young, but looking back I just remember playing in my flooded backyard. I digress. Looking at maps that predicted where the flood line would be if our icecaps melted showed the Gulf of Mexico would be well into Texas and knocking at the door of our hill country. Texas being Texas, most of our coast is relatively flat. There wouldn't be much in the way to keep the gulf from coming inland. Anyway, I thought it would be cool if  there was a way for the city grid to float with the tide. As the water receded, the structures would stay in-place leaving room for more infrastructure. Next flood comes and lifts the city up, including the newer infrastructure, and the process would repeat itself. each city block would be independent from the rest of the grid as far as moving vertically. Well, that issue was quickly shot down after discussion. I realized that even if the block was independent from the rest of the blocks, they would all move at the same pace because.... Houston is flat.

How do we move?
I think most of us are aware that we're slowly moving towards having autonomous cars. We have the technology and we're executing on that technology. We can even go and purchase a car that can park itself with a press of a button. How do autonomous cars move? GPS. Last week I was driving home on an evening so rainy that I could barely see the lines on the road. I thought it would be cool if the 'dots' in the road could communicate with my car to keep me in my lane regardless of the weather conditions. I know there is a short stretch of highway that is completely filled with solar panels and other forms of technology. But, to do an entire highway or even a loop system would be insanely expensive. So, how about we shrink down from thinking about the entire road to thinking about those little 'traffic dots' that notify us when we're moving out of our lane. I figured the 'dots' could easily be integrating within the roadways, could communicate with each other, send data to the city, and can communicate with the vehicles. While this was really interesting and we are moving towards having 'smart' roads, this was shut down too because while very interesting perspective, these topics didn't create 'space' in the city.

I commute to school from quite a distance (30+ miles). I proposed an upgraded HOV lane that was able to have your autonomous car 'plug' into. Almost like a a hybrid of how we get onto a highway from the feeder and a train system. When you're commuting from a distance that takes more than twenty-minutes, you start to realize how much time you have wasted when you could have been working or doing something. I mean, how cool would it be to be able to write this blog from the comfort of my vehicle without having a worry? I'll continue with this topic later in this post.

How do we work?

Downtown Houston.

I think for anyone that has walked through downtown Houston, you might have noticed how many parking garages we have. About a third of downtown Houston is parking. What would happen to those parking garages if we no longer needed them? How would they change the city? Could we redesign those parking garages into livable or workable spaces? I think so! Why not? Then, I started integrating the 'ferry' system I mentioned above and what if I could design a system that takes the vehicles and was able to park or 'plug-in' into a spot in the work/living space. If you no longer need to drive your car, your car becomes an extension of your office. The car no longer becomes a vehicle, but a cell that takes on a completely different form. It would be able to enter the base of the structure and taken on a conveyor belt-like system that plugs into a small section of the workspace from x-amount of hours. Once you're finished you could unplug, ride the conveyor down and get on the rail to your next location. This would allow this 'parking space' to be used by another person for x-amount of hours. Meaning, that 'building' is continuously used. Normally, we all check out at 5-ish and the building stays empty from 5-8 the next day. Right now, just a thought.

How do we communicate?

Green: Parks, Pink: Parking garages (not showing parking lots), Red: Main St.

I think we all have dreams of a future city being highly dense. I listen to my classmates talk about high dense Singapore is or Hong Kong and how everyone is on their mobile device. Nobody pays attention to their world. They're more concerned with how many 'likes' they received or how a celebrity is living their life. I think with more of these technological opportunities, we become more and more unsocial. I mean, every time you step out of the door you see someone you have never seen before. And guess what? More likely than not is that you will never see that person again even if you live within a certain area. I proposed having an app that would silently collect data on each person you come within a certain amount of feet. You wouldn't get any notifications, but at the end of the day you could see how many people you have crossed paths with and if you have actually interacted with them before.

This app idea needed to manifest itself into a physical space to relate to the project. So, what if I proposed a certain area/s of downtown Houston to be free of technology. Like, once you enter this park, you are unable to use technology because you cannot get wifi or any other signals within this space. 


Conclusion
Out of these proposals; I have decided to integrate the physical park-like space without technology signals, the ferry-like transportation system that brings your 'cell' to the city and the redesign of the parking garage. The progress of the proposal consists of being able to ride this rail-like system to the city. Once downtown when you start approaching this 'technology free park space', you go underneath the park and are able to enter the parking building from the base of the building (Which is still underneath the park) and ride this conveyor system to your work/living space. Keep in mind the form of the 'car' will no longer resemble a car, but become a cell that once 'plugged-in' would become part of the aggregate that becomes the building. I hope that all made sense. It is still really early in concept and further development and decisions need to happen, but that's the beauty of the design. I want to keep main street as a tradition main street. I think that shouldn't change. Houston is desperately needing more of that traditional main street walkable environment. I am hopeful I can develop these parks that can aid to a more walkable main street.

I just wanted to show this is an image of a highway in Dallas that was sunk just so a park can be built above the highway. The Office of James Burnett